I wanted to use this free blog to sort of document my journey
through this first quarter at Kalaheo. I
find myself redefining this masters program and the idea of place-based
learning on a daily basis. And in doing so I’m constantly thinking of new ways
to implement the things I learn in the classroom.
I recently saw a documentary called “Most Likely to Succeed”
that really summed up project-based learning and also helped me to see the
direction this master’s program is leading us. The movie was all about how our
education system is 100 years old and not relevant to this modern day age where
computers have taken the place of humans in the workforce. Therefore their
point was that our education system is failing because we’re using an outdated
educational system that was predicated on producing blue collar factory
workers. The old system stressed learning all the subjects in silos and
memorizing and testing students to retain information. What this movie was
saying is that nowadays, where machines can think and memorize 1000 times the
information that a human can, we have to create a new kind of student. We need
students that are able to problem solve,
think creatively, and work together. These are the qualities that a computer
cannot mimic, and therefore will be valued in the workplace as we move forward
into the future.
As I learn about all these problems with our DOE system, it’s
fascinating to me to see it play out firsthand in my classroom.
A perfect example is reflecting back to the first couple
weeks when my co-teacher explained her concern with all the “Hawaiian stuff” I
was teaching the kids. For one, she didn’t think it was relevant to Natural
Resource class, and two she was worried that the kids would fail the tests and
thus would reflect badly on her as a teacher. Her exact quote was, “I’m the one
who has to answer for poor test scores, and at the end of the day, that’s my
paycheck on the line. I think most of these kids are totally lost with all
these Hawaiian words. Can we tone down the “hawaiianess” a little?”
This is one crucial problem I see with the DOE, hiring
teachers who put their own prosperity over the education of the student. All I
heard was, “At the end of the day, money, money, money, me, me, me.”
At the time I felt bad. I was assuming that our students
were catching all the things I was telling them, but maybe she was right. What
if they were completely lost and I was failing them as a teacher? These
thoughts played on my mind for a bit.
But as I look back now 6 weeks later, I can clearly see the
whole picture. We tested the students on everything we had learned in 1st
quarter. My co-teacher pretty much let me make up the test questions, and I
think deep down she wanted to remove herself from the process because she
believed that the kids would badly fail the test and she could look at me and
say “I told you so.”
But what happened was the complete opposite. The kids aced
the test, nailing questions like, “What does mo’oku’auhau mean?” or “Name the 6
mountains that surround Kailua and match them with their mo’olelo?” I purposely
made the questions things that should be intuitive, rather than things that
would need to be memorized. Basically if they were paying attention in class, they
should ace the test, and sure enough they
did. As an extra credit question, I asked what’s the most interesting thing you
learned in class so far? The students said they loved learning about their
ahupua’a and their genealogy because those were things they would remember for
life, rather than just this year. They loved learning how to build aquaponics because
they got to build it themselves and it was something they could do at their own
home.
One of the questions that they struggled on was a watershed
worksheet, one of the few things my co-teacher did add to the test. She had
them label headwaters, tributaries, estuaries and floodplains on the diagram.
These are not normal words we hear every day in Hawaii and on top of that, she
only took one day to go through the worksheet with no context attached. They
bombed that portion of the test. It’s a classic example of the “spray and pray”
teaching style where you throw a bunch of unknown terms at the students and
pray they memorize it for the test.
The results of this test were astounding for me. It’s given
me a boost of confidence and fulfillment knowing that my attempts at place
based learning are taking hold. I’m surprised at how well all of our students,
even the ones not from here, are connecting to this place and viewing
themselves as part of the picture, rather than an outside spectator.
Aloha e Hayden - Thank you for this thoughtful blogpost, I could really relate to the idea of teaching curriculum that is meaningful but at times under appreciated (criticized). The anecdote that you shared about your co-teacher also illustrated that without the hands on portion of the learning process that the students were unable to connect to the information presented. All I can say is to try and continue inviting her into the space of collaboration. I may feel threatening for her to feel like her that she now has to put herself in the place of a learner.
ReplyDelete